About this Group
100 Years of The Royal Air Force Group Build.
Firstly, a big thank you to everyone for the impressive response to the suggestion of an RAF centenary group build. Secondly, special thanks to Boris for his behind the scenes coaching on how to organise my ideas for the project!
The aims of the group:
1. To build subjects to commemorate 100 years of RAF history.
2. To ‘reveal’ builds (new and old) in the form of a timeline from 1918 to 2018.
Start date: 1st of April 2018 (the 100-year anniversary of the founding of the RAF).
Reveal begins: 15th of September 2018 (Battle of Britain Day).
The ambition is to run 2 threads, one after the other:
1. The ‘work in progress/build log’ thread, for new builds only – showing progress, discussing kits and accessories, asking questions, sharing techniques and generally chatting away and supporting each other, as with any group build.
This would open ‘officially’ on April 1st 2018 – although much of the ‘inventory’ would undoubtedly shape up well before.
Although this seems a long way off (if you are reading this in December 2017) it has been set to coincide with the anniversary and to avoid clashes with the excellent group builds taking place on iModeler at present: please check them out – it is not too late to add something to either of the Year of the Cat or Kasserine Pass groups.
2. The ‘reveal’ thread: opening on September the 15th.
This will be an experiment to see if ‘reveals’ can be organised to produce a timeline representing the RAF’s story by decade.
At this point those wishing to submit previously completed builds would be warmly welcomed!
The first models revealed/posted would be subjects from 1918 -1919; at that point builds of subjects from these dates, both old and new, could be posted to the thread. Once we are satisfied that all subjects from that decade are in place, hopefully within a day or two, we’d move on to 1920-29, then 1930-39 and so on. This would finish with 2010-2018.
The reveal thread would show no ‘work in progress’, evaluations of kits or comments on techniques (etc) – only photos of the finished article, brief details of the kit (just name of subject, scale and manufacturer); and some writing about the subject pertaining to its operational history or specific story in terms of the RAF.
I am happy to run an inventory that is organised chronologically to help this run smoothly and to keep people well informed as to which builds are taking place.
I would be grateful if group members with new builds could initially let me know, whenever they are decided (and as of now):
1. Name of subject;
4. Year(s) in operation (specific to the subject of the build not the type);
5. Pilot, campaign and/or operation.
For those builds where ‘life gets in the way’ we will find a way to add them later – nothing will be excluded – but there is an undeniable time element to the project given that a decade by decade reveal couldn’t happen otherwise!
Some guidelines (not rules):
During the lead in to the build I have been asked some great questions about which aircraft would be ‘allowed’ into the group. Should we include Fleet Air Arm, Dominion Squadrons and lend-lease subjects? These are important and very valid questions but in short, I can’t answer definitively because I don’t know enough. The spirit of the group is to commemorate the history of the first 100 years of the RAF. I certainly don’t ‘know’ all of that history! In fact, I am hoping to learn a lot!
In essence, if it can be linked to the RAF it can be built! If in doubt I’d ask: ‘Did it come under RAF operational command?’ That said I am aware that there are other ways to judge it, and I wouldn’t want to limit anyone’s contributions. In the end, there will never be a strict ‘in’ or ‘out’ policy – only the spirit of the build.
Finally, here is what I’d consider might make this a successful project:
1. People having fun while developing their modeling skills and knowledge in the usual iModeler atmosphere of camaraderie.
2. Subjects built spanning the whole range of 100 years – with some models produced for every decade of the RAF thus far.
3. Iconic aircraft being represented.
4. Less well-known or less commonly built aircraft being represented.
5. A completed ‘time-line’ style reveal in approximate chronological order.
Anywhere else this might be too big a wish-list, here on iModeler however I think we can borrow, with confidence, Per ardua ad astra (just this once).
Recent activity in this group
Greetings all and thanks for your patience. The RAF centenary year officially ends on March 31st. I have decided to post the last presentation then as it seems a fitting point at which to wrap.
This change […]
A package arrived in the mail from Hannant’s a few days ago……………inside it was this !!!
Everything good that has been said about the new tool Tamiya Spitfire looks to be on the mark. It’s a […]
Well deserved, David!
Many thanks for your kind words Jeff@mikegolf !
Biplane builder or not, this is a GREAT representation of an interesting aircraft. VERY well done, David!
Thanks John I’m not normally a biplane builder!
Great work, David. That’s a really attractive little model.
Fantastic Ferry, great to see this very modern tech bringing us bang up to date in RAF100! A really accomplished build – looks like the real thing! Thanks for the brilliant contributions – you have chosen perfect […]
Italeri 1/72 General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper. RAF No 39 Squadron, Afghanistan 2011-2012.
Many thanks Allan!
I like that a whole lot, John!
Vickers Wellington Mk.Ia, No. 20 OCU, Scotland, 1940. 1/72 Airfix kit.
Well done David, looks good.
Thank you Paul !
Stunning, David – real craftsmanship! The prop really adds the cherry – great scheme, sharp paint job, and a 20s subject to boot. She’s already been added to the final presentation – just hanging on for a couple […]
Matchbox 1/72 Armstrong Whitworth Siskin III A
No.43 Squadron ‘The Fighting Cocks’.
Many thanks to Paul for all his efforts!
Windscreen on and a little burnt umber on the prop!
I think it is done now.
This really looks excellent now. You’d never mistake that thing for anything other than British. 🙂
This is looking gorgeous. A tight and beautifully finished build that utterly belies it’s age. That chequered scheme is anything but easy but you’ve made the effect look so natural and ‘right’. A very admirab […]
- Load More