MS.406.C1 number 3 - 1/48 Dora Wings

Started by Michael Turner · 16 · 2 weeks ago
  • Profile Photo
    Michael Turner said 3 weeks, 1 day ago:

    Along with @gblair and @yellow10 I’m buiding a Dora Wings MS.406.C1.

  • Profile Photo
    Paul Barber said 3 weeks, 1 day ago:

    Love it!

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 3 weeks, 1 day ago:

    Looking forward to your build, Michael (@michaelt). It should be fun to have 3 406s going at the same time. Cheers.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 3 weeks ago:

    Looking forward to your MS.406, my friend @michaelt!

  • Profile Photo
    gary sausmikat said 3 weeks ago:

    Looking forward to watching yours and the others... Have fun with it, Michael.

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 3 weeks ago:

    Hi, Michael (@michaelt). I had some problems today with the fuselage and wings. I suspect you can probably avoid them if you know they are coming. Check my latest post. Looking forward to your build. Cheers.

  • Profile Photo
    Michael Turner said 3 weeks ago:

    Thanks for the heads-up, @gblair. I am keeping tabs on your build.

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 3 weeks ago:

    Looking forward to your 406 as well, Michael @michaelt

  • Profile Photo
    Michael Turner said 2 weeks, 5 days ago:

    Well, I’ve cut the main parts off the sprue and played with the fit - nothing to show yet.
    The wing join across the flap and across the wing fillet on the top side are going to be annoying.

  • Profile Photo
    Paul Barber said 2 weeks, 5 days ago:

    @michaelt great to have all three 406s on the go! I’m toying with the idea of glueing the top wing portions in place before adding the lower wing section. I’ve seen @lgardner take this approach successfully before. Maybe too risky -will make a call when dry fitting. Would rather any filling to be underneath.

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 2 weeks, 5 days ago:

    Hi, Michael (@michaelt): The join between the top and bottom wing through the flap was annoying. Not only fill and sand, but you can also get some practice restoring the panel lines and flaps.

    Hi Paul (@yellow10): I think it is fun having 3 406s building. I bet we all 3 build them differently and they will all come out great. I would normally have glued the top and bottom wings together, and the dry fit looked good. I have seen other modelers glue the full span portion of the wing first, then add the tops. I decided to try gluing the full span portion first on this model, and you saw how it came out. My results may have been due to something I mis-aligned rather than the technique. I am sure yours and Michael's will come out more accurately than mine. I suspect Louis (@lgardner) could build the wings either way and have them come out fine.

    Cheers everyone.

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 2 weeks, 4 days ago:

    Hi, Michael (@yellow10):

    Spiros (@fiveten) just sent me a link to a great resource with lots of photos of the 406:

    https://www.asisbiz.com/FAF.html#google_vignette

    Cheers

  • Profile Photo
    Michael Turner said 2 weeks, 3 days ago:

    I've been doing a bit of research on Cne Robert Williame who's aircraft I'm planning on building.

    First point of call is the Osprey Aircraft of the Aces 121 "Morane-Saulnier MS.406 Aces".

    This has two of his aircraft profiled.

    The date given for the first one (No 686) is 27 May 1940, although the accompanying text says it was destroyed by strafing Bf 109s on 21st May. Either way, this was shortly after the attack on France.

    The second profile is of the kit aircraft (No 966) and dated June 1940 with the accompanying text not giving any further clarification.

    Then I came across this site: http://www.cieldegloire.fr/004_williame_r.php

    This states that Williame flew No 686 on 2nd April when he shared in a probable Do 17. This was obviously during "la drole de guerre".

    It states that this aircraft was damaged in combat with about 30 Bf 109s on 20th May resulting in the aircraft being sent to an air force workshop, which contradicts the Osprey book.

    No 686 was replaced by No 966 and, on 5th June, Williame shared in the destruction of two Ju 88s flying this aircraft. Unfortunately, the aircraft was damaged in this engagement and unavailable for a few days.

    Thus, Williame was flying a borrowed aircraft "5" (No 680) on his most success full day, 8th June, when he destroyed three Bf 109s (2 and 1 shared) in the late afternoon and shared in the destruction of three Ju 87s that evening.

    The above profiles show No 686 has a similar scheme to No 966 but with the buzz code L-715 in white under the wings and the name "Juliette" above the squadron stork on the rear fuselage, although the accompanying text says it was christened "Juliette II".

    So, can I trust myself to paint the "Juliette" by hand?

    Finally, I have found this picture of No 966.

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 2 weeks, 3 days ago:

    Hi, Michael (@michaelt): There are a bunch of really nice paint schemes to do, and seemingly all have a different camo pattern. I think the crew chiefs may have painted them after a night in the club. I have a bunch of the Osprey books sitting in my library, so I need to take a look to see if I might have that one. I am treating the dates on the color diagrams as a "non-specific" date. If the diagram has a date for the spring of 1939, I suspect the paint scheme was carried by the plane into the summer and fall. Same for a diagram of a plane in the late summer of 1940. I think the paint it had at the start of the Battle of France was the same paint in the spring of 1940. I don't really think the markings changed that much. This wasn't true of the British who were quickly changing the paint and markings of their planes to something more subdued before the Phoney War started. There were several cool paint schemes I considered, but they all have unit markings that might require hand painting, and my hand painting isn't that good. I found a couple of decal sets on Ebay for the 406 at really good prices. One set is in perfect condition, while the other is a little dubious. Looking forward to your scheme.

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 2 weeks, 2 days ago:

    Some very interesting documentation, Michael @michaelt
    Pretty sure you can trust yourself to paint this by hand.