BAE Sea Harrier FRS 1 - 1/24th Scale

Started by Colin Gomez · 27 · 1 year ago
  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 3 years, 1 month ago:

    Nice presentation, indeed, @coling!
    Good that te intakes will be used!
    Pity about the resin bubbles, but it happens quite often in resin parts...

  • Profile Photo
    Colin Gomez said 3 years, 1 month ago:

    Thanks, guys. I have been working on assembly of major components, including essential surgery. At this point I have run into some ambiguity in the instructions and lack of clear info on the Internet. Airfix has crafted the new forward fuselage in a strange way that leaves some gaps. There are also no measurements as to the depth of cuts. So far, I have cut off the GR 3 part and sanded down the remainder for maximum care and accuracy before fitting of the FRS 1 part. Airfix has certain guides built in to attach the FRS 1 fuselage insert but they don't work well. Here is the inside view.

    Viewed from outside, a gap remains just under the rear shelf behind the ejection seat. Also, when the bottom of the insert aligns properly with the bottom of the fuselage and wheel bay, there is a step in the meeting point of the insert and GR3 fuselage for this same shelf. I feel pretty confident it is well enough placed by the perfect fit at the bottom. Fitting the whole assembly helps me to doubly confirm everything. I have used only a little liquid glue to do this temporarily. Here is a general question to anyone who has built this kit or has seen pics of how this joint works. Do I have this right? The gap actually disappears behind the installed intake part, so no biggie. The step in the shelf probably disappears under the canopy piece when it is slid back (which it will be). I can fill and level everything easily but I wan to be sure i have it all glued on right. I think I do and Airfix just makes this whole joint a bit crudely. Comments? Anybody seen WIP pics online or in books? Even with my current resource books and pics I haven't found anything myself yet. Strange, since this is such an obvious bit of awkwardness in the assembly process. Thanks in advance for your insights.

  • Profile Photo
    Colin Gomez said 3 years, 1 month ago:

    Ah, finally found these pics of a build on International Scale Modeler from 2014. Thanks, "Joesdad."

    https://intscalemodeller.com/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=6748&start=60

    Great that a brave modeler found the same fit and documented it. I guess my work is cut out for me. (quite literally).

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 3 years, 1 month ago:

    Always great to have a pathfinder on a lesser known road, my friend @coling!
    Isn't internet a wondeful tool?
    Your Harrier looks better and better!

  • Profile Photo
    Tom Cleaver said 3 years, 1 month ago:

    @coling - what a ton of work this is going to be. Neither the kit nor the correction items are that new. Some serious "Old school modeling" required. But I do think it will be an excellent result.

  • Profile Photo
    Colin Gomez said 3 years, 1 month ago:

    Thanks, Spiros and Tom. Yes, it is great having the Internet to check things. I think I have spent more hours staring at pics of cockpits from the Net this week then actually building. As you might guess from this intensity of research, I have decided to take the plunge in super detailing the SHAR. I am starting with the cockpit, which also necessitates getting the fuselage insert grafted on permanently. I have now got it attached on both sides and nicely lined up with no bends.

    I don't want to find it banana shaped after the interior detailing is done and have to saw it apart then. The instructions say to do the insert separately and then glue it on after it's fully painted and assembled, but that make no sense to me and is asking for trouble.

    So this week was all about the joys of scratch-building. I started with the instrument panel. The resin piece is pretty crude, with murky detail and quite a bit of fictional composition of dial and switches. There are surprisingly few good interior views on the internet and in books of the 1982 FRS 1 cockpit. After studying and comparing, I have figured out the differences between FRS 1 and FA 2. Here are two shots of the FRS 1, the first minus the Blue Fox Radar scope on the right side

    Here is the FA 2 pit with two screens. Thus, for most details some well-photographed FA 2 pits are OK for key elements of the FRS 1 (except that the original Blue Fox radar arrangement is quite distinctive). I also recently found some great shots of the Indian Navy HAL version of the FRS 1, even better and very close to the Falklands era version (the radar screen is a bit larger and some dials therefore displaced, etc.). Anyway , it is clear that the only way to get an authentic '80s era FRS 1 cockpit in 1/24th scale is scratch building. The first stage for me after research and thought is to gather tools and materials, including sheet styrene, Waldron punch set, Waldron instrument dials, Airscale cockpit placards in 1/24th and 1/32nd scale, scrap photo-etch and large scale photo etch sets that I won't be using for their designed purpose. BTW, I like to look for useful shapes on photo-etch frets, especially very small and delicate detail elements in well laid out sheets. It is sometimes easier to find what you need on a full fret (repurposed) than in the scraps box. Airfix's main control panel for the SHAR is so poor, thick and featureless that it is best to start completely from scratch with sheet styrene. I traced around the outline of Airfix's version to cut out the new panel I then began punching out the dials with my Waldron punch and die set. I used photos of real panels plus the kit and resin versions to judge how large to make the holes for the instruments. I actually inserted the punches in the holes of the kit panel and Heritage's version to check the approximate diameter of some dials. Even though I am using what I have in this basic way, almost all of the holes for dials in the kit AND resin panels are inaccurate in relative proportion and patterned arrangement. As a result, I have to enlarge some holes carefully and create my own grids to line things up accurately. There is a lot of balanced asymmetry in the real SHAR instrument panel which kit makers have tried to simplify (see previous pics). I have gone for accuracy in my version with, for example, a larger bezel for the attitude direction indicator in the central cluster of four. In some cases, I have drilled smaller openings or sanded out smaller ones which do not match the punch sizes I have. I am pretty happy with the results so far. Interestingly, Airfix and Heritage have made the central panel stick out ahead of the side panels but a careful look at photos show it should be recessed back. I therefore sliced of the "wings" of my new version, crafted wedges as inserts and recreated the correct form in miniature. Here is the original as reference: I have good dials in my generic Waldron Jet Aircraft Instruments set which even at 1/32 scale are exactly the right sizes for the SHAR panel. I also have the perfect decals from Airscale for the zebra earning stripes on the weapons panel (again in 1/32 but just right for this 1/24th pit). I will place the Waldron dials on white styrene covered with clear styrene sheet and then glue the panel piece I have crafted over top, just like doing an Eduard photo-etch panel. I will also pre-paint all elements before assembly. This will help with realism by not slopping on paint over the piece after assembly. Another thing I am doing is detailing some parts of the main panel and side consoles using scraps from the spares box. I have taken some parts from a Tamiya F-4C (extra to the F-4J boxing) to simulate some switches and dials on the central instrument post. I sanded these down drastically from behind first to thin them down. Using bits and pieces like this is sort of like they way they build miniatures for the movies, using discarded bits of diverse kits to create authentic looking detail. In this case, the old F-4 bits match quite closely with the photos of real SHAR equipment and looks better then anything I could make from scratch. Finally, I have some printed placards on foil backing that I can carve up to make cockpit switch panels and placard (as seen in several of the previous pics). It is hard to make such details by painting or building them up so the printed bits will be useful and pleasing to the eye.

    That's it for now for the SHAR. This is fun work but tiring on the eyes.

    With enough detailing done for today, I have to get back to my Buffalo for a painting session tomorrow. More updates on that other project soon.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 3 years, 1 month ago:

    Wow, my friend @coling!
    To say that this is the best scratch built instrument panel I have ever seen, might be an underestimation!
    You have done meticulous research and implementation, including usage and modification of existing aftermarket bits.
    Congratulations, I am left speechless!

  • Profile Photo
    Erik Gjørup said 3 years ago:

    This has all the sure signs of a labour of love! Great stuff Colin

  • Profile Photo
    Colin Gomez said 1 year, 2 months ago:

    Well. I can't believe it has been 1 year, 10 months since I started this build. Truth be told, I found myself overwhelmed with the work required to get this properly started. I decided to do a few easier kits to build my skills and then come back to this. The builds I completed, which included the 32nd scale Brewster Buffalo, absorbed me for several months and always left me not quite ready to tackle the complexities of the SHAR. But now I am back to it and it looks quite doable again.

    One thing that got to me was the blow-in doors for the intakes. No matter how much I studied the pictures that I had, I couldn't figure out how they should be shaped. I elected not to use the resin intakes I had because they were just too crude, not even symmetrical between port and starboard.

    Anyway, I have found that the best way to figure out the shape and orientation of each door is to actually start the carving work, following the basic outlines of what Airfix has already provided (which is very vague). A strip of masking tape would act as a guide to cutting and keep things aligned I also realized I only have to open up the top four doors on each side for an aircraft in a parked state. I took the plunge and started by drilling small holes inside the roughly rectangular segment of each door I would open. I then carved this out with an X-acto and sanded each opening with home-made sanding sticks cut and shaped for maximum control in removing material. i followed aspects of the resin intakes for some guidance along the way, even though I wanted mine to be better. Then, I found that I needed to ADD some plastic to adjust the size and shape of each opening. No problem. I am constantly checking photos of real aircraft from museums and in action to check the way the doors should be shaped. I also line up the two intakes together to get good port/starboard symmetry. Not perfect yet but getting there. At this stage, I am building up the box structure of the duct behind each door and will add the doors themselves made from sheet styrene at the very end, maybe later in the painting stages. I am pretty happy with the results, although more shaping needs to be done yet. Definitely better than the crude resin version.

    Besides the blow-in in doors, I will have to fill in the notch at the top of each intake.

    This is left over from the GR-1 version with a differently shaped canopy. Should be easy enough with laminated sheet styrene. When the intake work is done I will return to the cockpit for some more relaxing scratch-building. Hope to get this show back on the road with substantial work done this month.

    Thanks to Allan Withers and his 1/72 SHAR build in the GB for getting me interested in this again.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 1 year, 2 months ago:

    Really amazing job, my friend @coling! Fantastic craftsmanship!

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 1 year, 2 months ago:

    Excellent scratch building, Colin @coling
    Way better than the resin ones.

  • Profile Photo
    Colin Gomez said 1 year, 2 months ago:

    Thanks, Spiros and John. I have more to add here soon on getting the intake pieces aligned with the main assembly. I think I have a solution to a very tricky fit. More soon.