Franz Stigler and Charlie Brown; a story for the generations. For Bernie.

Started by david leigh-smith · 385 · 6 years ago · 1/48, diorama, Luftwaffe, USAF, WW2
  • Profile Photo
    david leigh-smith said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    Yes, Aleks, the 109 had been prepped, rubbed down, and had Tamiya grey primer. The underside was sprayed with Vallejo acrylic Lichtblau.

    My daughter is 13 years old, and has smaller feet than me but I like short socks. You see, this is the heart of social modeling. Be a man, Alex - get on the pink.

  • Profile Photo
    Aleksandar Sekularac said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    You are right, these are amazin’!
    P.S. I apologize to all the psychoanalysts among you, who will immediately recognize my insecurity in wearing girly socks and consequent need to add manly symbols to the composition…

    1 attached image. Click to enlarge.

  • Profile Photo
    Peter Hausamann said 6 years, 4 months ago:

  • Profile Photo
    david leigh-smith said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    @asekular - your awareness of the sublimation of your feminine psyche into more acceptable phalus symbols is impressive. Donning the pink socks, though, that takes a real man.

  • Profile Photo
    david leigh-smith said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    Peter @tecko - a true champion of house elves everywhere. There's tomorrow's DIY project sorted. My daughter will be delighted!

  • Profile Photo
    david leigh-smith said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    Meanwhile, somewhere in London there was a model being built...

    The dihedral for this Revell B-17 is just shocking, more of an anhedral if anything. The correct angle for a fortress is 4.5 degrees, which on a bird this size, is noticeable. When you compare to the completely neutral angle of the horizontal stabilisers it's clearer to see.

    I had to make a couple of plasticard 'shims' to wedge between the lower wing halves and the fuselage. I toyed with the idea of making a couple of spars but as the plane will be in flight, the stand I have planned will take care of any potential wing droop. Modeling viagra.

    This is how she looks from a front elevation and I think it stacks up quite favourably in relation to the genuine aircraft.

    I had planned to leave the wings off for the sake of space, ease of handling & painting, but this dihedral issue meant so much remedial work on the wing root and fuselage and that I had to scrap that approach.

    The project at the moment feels a little messy and poorly managed. I think maybe every build goes through this stage (unless you restrict yourself to modern, well engineered kits) where you are so involved with the repair work its hard to connect the carnage with the concept. But it's getting somewhere and it takes some broken eggs to make an omelette, no?

  • Profile Photo
    david leigh-smith said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    I worked on some flap damage (sometime I ought to start a list of 'sentences I never thought I'd say') and did yet more sanding today.

    With the airbrush still MIA, I spray canned some Tamiya primer & touched up with Mr. Surfacer on the underside of the B-17 and now regrouping, considering the next phase.

  • Profile Photo
    david leigh-smith said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    101 things to do when you don't have an airbrush, number 87...do some DIY.

    Here's an art installation I've been working on today.

    As a piece of art it's actually a bit rubbish, so just as well it also works as a base for my project.

    I'm feeling a little better about this build now, I think getting some primer over all that sanding and seeing it take shape has helped. The composition captures something of the feel I'm looking for; although the proximity of the two aircraft is exaggerated, I feel it binds the two together and hopefully helps bring the viewer in.

    Thanks to @gkittinger for the inspiration for the base.

  • Profile Photo
    Morne Meyer said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    David I am in awe of what you have achieved thus far. The battle damage looks super realistic!

  • Profile Photo
    david leigh-smith said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    Thank you, Morne. I now have a pretty comprehensive library of photos of battle scarred B-17s and still have a bit to do on the 'Olde Pub' - but she's getting there. I'm hoping the upper surfaces turn out as clean as the underside because this bird took a lot of putty, filing, cutting, and sanding. I'm really disappointed in the cockpit canopy. The fit was so bad I had to slice and dice my way around it and to my eye, close up, it's awful. Thinking of emailing Revell Germany (their customer service is top class) to send some more clear parts and I'll have another crack at it.

    Really looking forward to getting some paints on this.

  • Profile Photo
    david leigh-smith said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    Mmm. No, reflecting on the canopy, it has to go. Might have made the team before iModeler days, but the work around here has really raised the bar for me. So, it'll be out with the razor saw and 'gird my loins' for some fine detail work around the nose section.

    I know David Thomas has talked about the perils of perfectionism in some of his posts, and I've worked with many people who suffer from this (mainly students). Some of the work I see in the Headlines here makes me wonder about the hours in isolation we spend over the smallest of details, worrying over positive displacement pumps and the variants of the DB 605. Like most, I hope, this feels to me like a challenge rather than a curse. Interesting aside, in psychology we differentiate between unremitting high standards and clinical perfectionism by the amount of pleasure someone can take from their achievements. Happy to say it's very clear just how the former shines through in this community.

  • Profile Photo
    Peter Hausamann said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    The perfectionist is never pleased in their achievements, though they may get temporary pleasure by the attention from others.

    Glad to see that you like to be accurate about depicting a historical event, as opposed to unintentionally creating a 'what-if' event. The model is looking better every day. It's a treat to see it revealing what actually happened.

  • Profile Photo
    Morne Meyer said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    David this is a spectacular build ! I am sure you will be able to sort out the B 17's canopy repairs! Judging by what you have accomplished thus far, I can only say this is going to be something special. Glad to see you used the hot needle trick. The damage to the shattered nose looks awesome.

  • Profile Photo
    Tom Bebout said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    Looking good David, your attention to detail is exceptional. You may want to consider using rattle cans to paint the Fort. I use them quite often, my rule of thumb is the bigger the model, use a can. Especially if I'm not doing a camo pattern and I can find the correct color. Tamiya markets their AS-7, USAAF Neutral Grey, it goes on very well and dries to a very nice smooth finish. They also have an Olive Drab. Once applied you can add a wash to highlight detail of represent weathering. Just a thought for keeping the process going full speed ahead.

  • Profile Photo
    david leigh-smith said 6 years, 4 months ago:

    Tom, I have to be honest the thought of 'rattling' the Fort did not even cross my mind, but now that the idea is there in my head it won't go away. Most of my weathering is done post varnish with pigments and oils anyway, so this would make a lot of sense. Damn, that's a great idea. Thank you!