Three Nicks and a tanker

Started by Michael Turner · 79 · 1 week ago
  • Profile Photo
    Michael Turner said 2 months, 1 week ago:

    I should add that, due to an administratve error, the club comp has been pushed back from March to June. So, I have a bit more time to get the Hei completed.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 2 months, 1 week ago:

    Missed your previous posting, my friend @michaelt. You are doing a super job on all! Great that the date has been pushed back. Looking forward to your progress!

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 2 months, 1 week ago:

    Missed your post as well, Michael @michaelt
    I agree that you are doing a wonderful job on those builds.
    Glad to hear that you are still able to make it tfor the competition his way

  • Profile Photo
    Michael Turner said 2 months, 1 week ago:

    Thanks for following along @fiveten and @johnb

  • Profile Photo
    Michael Turner said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    The first one has her undercoat on.


    This is the Hei and you can see the home defenxe bands are masked as is the leading edge yellow plus the stripes on the vertical tail/rear fuselage.

    Masking the leading edge was more painful than I expected, so I will try and reuse the masks on the other two.

  • Profile Photo
    Michael Turner said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    And base colour painted.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    Excellent painting, my friend @michaelt!

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    Very nice paintwork, Michael @michaelt

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    Looks great, Michael @michaelt. I always have trouble painting anything on the leading edge, whether it's ID markings or de-icing boots. I have tried painting the edges first, masking the edges, and then painting the rest of the plane, and I have also tried painting the plane first, and then painting the edges. It doesn't seem to matter which way I do it, they will be a problem child either way.

  • Profile Photo
    Michael Turner said 1 month, 1 week ago:

    Camoflage painted.

    I originally painted a much more open squiggle scheme on the wings like on the tail and fuselage, but thought it was too minimalist. So, I resprayed the grey-green and sprayed this much tighter green scheme.

    I left the fuselage as it was. The last, lower, photo shows a similar scheme on the rear fuselage and an interesting cross-hatch scheme on the vertical tail of a Hei.

    It just shows that the real painters were inconsistent, too.

    There is a little bit of seepage on the rear edge of the fuselage band to fix up.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 1 month, 1 week ago:

    Excellent painting, my friend @michaelt! Indeed, the inconsistency seen at the pics is really interesting!

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 1 month, 1 week ago:

    That's a very nice applied camouflage scheme, Michael @michaelt
    Very interesting picture as well. Unfortunately my Mandarin is not that great to understand what is written there.

  • Profile Photo
    Michael Turner said 1 month, 1 week ago:

    Thanks @fiveten and @johnb.
    This is what Google Translate says:
    Ki-45 Kai Hei Type 2 Two-Seat Fighter Type C

    ↑↓ The Ki-45 Kai Hei was equipped with a new Ho-203 37mm cannon instead of the two Ho-103 12.7mm cannons on the upper nose of the Ki-45 Kai Ko. The conventional wisdom had been that this model was the Ki-45 Kai Otsu, but the aforementioned "List of Designations of Current Army Prototype Aircraft" lists it as the Ki-45 Kai Hei, with serial numbers 3001-5001. Also, the conventional wisdom that this nose gun was a Ho-5 20mm cannon and the Ho-203 was equipped on the underside of the fuselage is incorrect, as shown in the above list, and the shape of the barrel is completely different from the Ho-5, so this is clear. The Ho-203 was developed to turn the 37mm gun, which was only available on tanks, into a gun for aircraft use. It was recoil-operated, weighed 89kg, had a muzzle velocity of 576m/sec, and fired 120 rounds per minute. The nose was extended to completely cover the barrel, and the model name overlaps with the Ki-45 Kai Hei, which was the conventional theory. However, the "protruding barrel type" was probably produced by the Army Air Arsenal by modifying the old Ki-45 Kai Ko between May and October 1943, and the mass-produced aircraft in Kawasaki were presumably the "extended nose type." The three photos on this page and the top of the next page show the aircraft that was first shown to the general press in November 1944 at Tokorozawa Airfield in Saitama Prefecture, along with the Ki-3 and Ki-4 fighters, and the photo was also first published in a newspaper on the 26th of the same month under the nickname "Toryu." Therefore, up until that point, the Ki-45 Kai had never been called "Toryu" within the Army.

  • Profile Photo
    Louis Gardner said 1 month, 1 week ago:

    Michael Turner (@michaelt)
    I don't know how I missed this build journal... but somehow I have. I really like what you are doing here.

    https://imodeler.com/groups/the-empire-of-japan-1919-1946/forum/topic/ki-45-toryu-nick-mini-group-build-build-em-if-ya-got-em/

    Several years ago I started a similar build thread that was a part of our Empire of Japan group. I have two or possibly three kits that were started, and then for some reason I stopped working on them... It was nothing to do with the kits, as I think they are very good, just as you have been showing us here.

    I probably had a life event get in the way or possibly I jumped onto another project, and failed to finish them.

    I'm definitely taking notes here, and I will be using them as a reference when I get back around to building mine up someday... Hopefully sooner than later !

    You are doing a wonderful job. I don't know if I would touch up the "bandages" or not. I know that some of these were delivered in the overall light gray and then camouflaged once in the field. When this happened, there were the occasional mistake made when the painter accidentally strayed onto an area that was not supposed to be camouflaged.

    I also like how you have the different style / pattern on the tail and how it is different from the rest of the aircraft.

    Very cool, and it looks extremely realistic.

    I look forward to your next installment.

    Take care.

  • Profile Photo
    Michael Turner said 1 month, 1 week ago:

    @lgardner, I remember that group build and would have joined in but for the fact that I had other projects on the go at that time.

    Never too late to join, though?

    I just had a peek and saw @fiveten magnificent build. One of mine will have a similar camouflage scheme, although I’m going to attempt it free-hand.

    I hope you get back to your builds soon.