1/72 Valom Vickers Wellesley

Started by George R Blair Jr · 79 · 1 hour ago · 1/72, North Africa, Valom, Vickers, Wellesley
  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    Good evening everyone. I hope your Black Friday shopping didn't take too much out of you. Having complete a 1/28 Revell Fokker Dr.1, I thought I might be brave enough to try something in 1/72. I usually prefer 1/48, but I have been dragging this kit around for a long time. It looks like it might be a fun build.

    First, for those of you who might be unfamiliar with some of the more obscure WW2 British bombers, let's start with a short history. The Wellesley was designed to meet the requirements of RAF requirement G.4/31 in 1931. The requirement was for a general purpose aircraft to replace the Vickers Vincent in the bombing and torpedo bombing role. In addition, the requirement wanted a plane that had a good forward view, a short takeoff and landing capability, the the ability to carry a heavy load. At this point, Barnes Wallis, the designer who would later design the Wellington, Warwick, and Windsor bombers, stepped into the picture. Wallis had previously been involved in the design of the R.100 dirigible using geodetic principles. He convinced Vickers that geodetic design principles could be used in aircraft to create a strong and light design. Wallis produced a design for the G.4/31 requirement using geodetic framing. Vickers wasn't sure that a monoplane could meet the requirements, so they submitted two designs: a monoplane and a biplane. A number of other British companies also submitted designs. The Vickers monoplane was one of three designs chosen to enter a fly-off competition. Before the Vickers design was allowed to compete, the RAF insisted on testing the strength of the revolutionary geodetic design. The plane passed with flying colors. Following the flyoff, the Wellesley was picked as the clear winner. An order for 96 airframes was placed with Vickers. By the time the planes began to leave the assembly line, it had become very obvious that England would soon be at war with Germany. The RAF requested that the Wellesley be optimized for bombing. Wallis was afraid that adding a bomb bay to the fuselage of the plane would significantly weaken the geodetic structure of the fuselage, so "panniers" were added to each wing. Looking like an external fuel tank, the two panniers were essentially external bomb bays. Each panniers was capable of carrying 4 x 250 pound bombs, 2 x 500 pound bombs, or a combination of bombs. Testing revealed that the range of the Wellesley was considerably higher than first thought. After some long-range trial flights, a record-breaking flight by 3 Wellesleys. They departed Ismailia, Egypt and landed in Darwin, Australia 48 hours and 5 minutes later. They covered 7,160 miles non-stop. One plane was running low on fuel, so only 2 planes actually finished the flight. This feat broke the existing long distance record by a large degree. By the time the Wellesley began flying combat, it was essentially obsolete. At the start of the war, it was used as a bomber in both Europe and North Africa. By 1943, most of the Wellesleys had been withdrawn from service.

    I have been dragging this model around for a long time. It looks like it might be fun to build. The kit includes the plastic parts (including complete fuselages for 2 different versions) and PE. It has decals for 2 aircraft in service in North Africa. The planes have interesting paint schemes. They were quickly pressed into service when they reached North Africa, so they were not completely repainted in desert colors. The planes arrived in the Europe scheme of dark green and dark earth. As an expedient, the dark green was overpainted in light earth. It should be fun to replicate this unusual camo, as well as the weathering provided by use in harsh desert conditions.

    I hope to get started on this model tomorrow, but who knows during this time of the year. Cheers everyone.

    6 attached images. Click to enlarge.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    Excellent entry, my friend @gblair! Will be really striking when finished!

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    Thanks, Spiros (@fiveten). I think this will be another fun one.

  • Profile Photo
    Christopher Amano-Langtree said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    The different fuselages are for the Long Range Development Flight and the ordinary Wellesley. I have the complete AP for the Wellesley and if you need anything just send me a PM.

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    A very nice entry, George @gblair
    Looking forward to this one.

  • Profile Photo
    Carl Smoot said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    Well this is certainly a different direction from the triplane George (@gblair). I foresee possible 3D printing work coming on this one. It will make for a striking aircraft in your collection. Looking forward to following along.

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    Thanks, Christopher (@christopher), John (@johnb), and Carl (@clipper). I was drawn to this kit a long time ago by its unusual cockpit configuration. The kit is relatively complete, so I don't plan to add much to it. The biggest problem with this kit is it has long wings compared to most 1/72 bombers. The wingspan seems about the same as a B-17 or B-24. I have a couple of guides to the Wellesley, so I think I will be OK as far as photos and other info. Thanks for stopping by.

  • Profile Photo
    Christopher Amano-Langtree said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    No problem - one thing to watch out for are the under fuselage bomb aimers windows which both Matchbox and Valom missed.

  • Profile Photo
    John Healy said 1 month, 2 weeks ago:

    Great choice, George. I have that one in the stash too.

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 month, 1 week ago:

    Hi Christopher (@christopher) and John (@j-healy): I was just reading about the bomb-aimer's window and was wondering where it was. A little research needed, I think. This will be a cool model, John, but there are some limited run obstacles to overcome along the way.

  • Profile Photo
    Christopher Amano-Langtree said 1 month, 1 week ago:

    Hi George - it was just in front of the oil cooler and consisted of two windows which could be opened for the sight to be deployed. Here are some photos which show the location and shapes.

    3 attached images. Click to enlarge.

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 month, 1 week ago:

    I am in the midst of a crazy week, but I got a little time to work on the model today. Mainly interior work, but I started getting some of the sub-assemblies done. Being a limited run kit, there are no locating pins or other niceties to worry about. I noticed there are no locating holes or anything else to position the gear, which is supposed to be butt-jointed to the wings. I think that will need to be improved. There is also no detail in the gear well, but I don't know if I am too worried about that right now. Hopefully more tomorrow. Cheers.

    7 attached images. Click to enlarge.

  • Profile Photo
    Christopher Amano-Langtree said 1 month, 1 week ago:

    Hi George (@gblair)

    Very nice work so far. Valom are pretty good on the undercarriage. It was boxed in just as they've represented it but it attached to the geodesic framing which isn't really represented (not actually easy to do as I found out). There really aren't any wires or the like to worry about. The main undercarriage bays also housed auxiliary fuel tanks so the bay ceiling was featureless. It's not easy to see on photos but the fabric portion of the interior was brick red in colour.

    Christopher

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 1 month, 1 week ago:

    That's a great start already, George @gblair
    Looking forward to see this interior getting together.

  • Profile Photo
    Felix said 1 month, 1 week ago:

    Taking a seat and following with great interest, George @ gblair. Love those early 30ies planes!