Clive Caldwell’s Spitfire VIII – Eduard kit

Started by Tom Cleaver · 22 · 3 years ago
  • Profile Photo
    Tom Cleaver said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    You get a lot of extra parts with the "Eagles Call" kits. Which leads to this project.

    I have long wanted to do Clive Caldwell's Spitfire VIII in its final configuration, armed with four cannons. That, however, required changing the gun bay panel to the larger fairing that allowed mounting of two guns in each wing.

    The Eagles Call box includes two sprue T, the sprue with the Sptifre V detail parts. After using the gun panel from one sprue for the Spitfire Vc, I had the panel from the other sprue. The sprue also had the four early 20mm cannon barrel fairings. So, with the Spitfire VIII profipack kit just sitting there in the pile...

    The big thing is to change the panel. Since that is molded in to the upper wing of the Spitfire VIII kit, it has to be removed. And you have to do so without harming any of the surface detail surrounding it.

    I cut out the panel, about 1/16 inch in from the border. Then I trimmed out almost to the border, then smoothed the boundary, angling it in from the top. I also angled in the new gun panel. I kept test-fitting and filing until I had perfect fit. With the inward slope, I could press the panel into position without any risk of pushing it through. I also opened the outer shell ejection chute in the lower wing.

    The wing was assembled and the gun barrels attached. And there it was - the heart of the model completed. The rest, as they say, was a nice easy downhill stroll.

    Now masked, and ready for paint.

    6 attached images. Click to enlarge.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    Great modification, my friend @tcinla! The "angled" approach is a brilliant idea.
    Looking froward to the painting!

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    Well performed modification, Tom @tcinla.
    Thanks for sharing the tip.

  • Profile Photo
    Allan J Withers said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    Good one Tom !

  • Profile Photo
    Thomas Oakes said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    They look like a very nice, blended fit. I have the Mk VIII as a Profipak myself from Eduard and its the next model to land on my workbench once the Beaufighter is done, so now I'm REALLY curious: how was the general fit and shape of the plastic? I only ask because I've noticed with Eduard kits they can be a bit hit-and-miss - the 108 Taifun practically built and painted itself, but the 1/48 Bf-110E weekend ed. was awful going together (I never finished it in fact), and my 109G6 went together 'Okay', however had several minor issues with fitment / position because I invested in a full engine, landing gear, radio compartment, photo-etch and cockpit from Eduard as well... I want to do the same with my Spitfire VIII that I did with the 109G, (using Eduard accessories), but I'm a little concerned I'll have similar problems.

  • Profile Photo
    Tom Cleaver said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    @luftfanatic - with ALL the Eduard Spitfire kits, you MUST insure that EVERY SPRUE NUB IS REMOVED. The mating surfaces must be ABSOLUTELY CLEAN. Take your time fitting parts together and be sure they are EXACTLY where they should be before committing any glue. Get the fuselage together nice and tight with that cockpit assembled perfectly.

    And then be prepared for some "industrial strength pushing and shoving" to get the wing and fuselage sub assemblies together. You will have to bend the wing down to spread it wide enough to get the join together. Do not fear - it won't break and when you are done, if you got all the prior assembly done as perfectly as possible, the wing will have the proper dihedral, and there will be no need of any putty on any seams.

    That wing/fuselage meet-up is the one difficult part. All else just goes together.

    I have entertained the thought of attaching the lower wing to the fuselage once that is assembled, then attaching the upper wing and getting all aligned that way. I think that is possible and I will try it on the next one. You could consider that if what I described above is scary. But remember the kit is molded very precisely and you can't just slap things together. Doing these Spitfires and the P-51s has turned me into a more careful modeler, which is a good thing.

  • Profile Photo
    Thomas Oakes said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    Thanks for the advice, Tom. I don’t mind a bit of ‘pushing and shoving’, it’s when the parts don’t even come close to mating up (the 110E was horrible). I’m going to have to post some photos and commentary on my blog about some of my ‘recent adventures’ it seems to help warn others.

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    Looks good, Tom (@tcinla). I have noticed on some of the newer kits that the manufacturer tends to put the sprue attachments on the gluing edge of a part. That would seem like a good idea until you start getting parts that won't quite fit because of a nano-nub that didn't get completely removed. And if you are too aggressive removing the nub, then you get an area you need to fill. Still a better option than having the sprue attach on the surface of the part. I built a kit a few months back that had a clear part with the sprue attachment on one of the panes of glass. That was fun.

  • Profile Photo
    Tom Cleaver said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    @gblair - yes - exactly right all around!

  • Profile Photo
    Tom Cleaver said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    @luftfanatic - yeah, the 1/48 Eduard 110s are as "not so great", the same as their first Fw-190s. They ought to do the same thing for this set of kits they did for the 190s - the new ones are as close to perfect as kits get. The 1/72 110 series is good.

  • Profile Photo
    Tom Cleaver said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    Here it is painted with a gloss coat applied for decals.

    According to Peter Mossong, the best source on RAAF RNZAF painting and markings, these first Mk. VIIIs were delivered, like the first Mk. Vc's, in desert colors. In the case of the Mk. VIII, that meant painted at Aboukir (the Vc was the only Spitfire that came out of the factory in desert colors, that was the standard for the Vc), and then - again like the first Vc's - the Middle Stone was overpainted with Foliage Green. So given the one photo of the nose shows the airplane had the upper colors down over the underside of the nose, I took it as being a scheme from Aboukir that would have been similar to the 31xst FG HF Mk.VIII, so I copied that. There aren't any photos showing the upper scheme clearly, just on one side, but that looks a lot like this, so it's an "inspired/educated guess."

    Also, when he armed this airplane with 4 cannon, he would have used a cannon cover from a Spitfire Vc, so I decided those were in full Australian colors, so did the left on in overall Earth Brown and the right in Earth Brown/Foliage Green, with both more faded than the rest of the airframe.

    5 attached images. Click to enlarge.

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    Great result, Tom @tcinla.
    The difference on the cannon covers is definitely visible.

  • Profile Photo
    Tom Cleaver said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    Here it is done.

    3 attached images. Click to enlarge.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    Looking utterly realistic, @tcinla!
    Super job, love the markings, as well!

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 3 years, 2 months ago:

    Great build, Tom @tcinla
    Very nice weathering as well.