Sova-M 1/72 T-46A Eaglet NGT

Started by George R Blair Jr · 39 · 1 year ago · 1/72, Eaglet, Fairchild-Republic, NGT, Sova-M, T-46A
  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    I never thought I would see a plastic model manufactured of this airplane, after all, only 3.6 of these planes were ever built. When this kit from Ukrainian company Sova-M popped up, I snatched it up as soon as I could. I have a personal connection to this little-known plane. In the early 1980s, the NGT Program (Next Generation Trainer) sought to find a suitable replacement for the T-37. I was a T-37 instructor pilot at the time and was lucky to chosen to be part of a team of instructors who would make a recommendation on which plane we thought would be the best choice. There were a number of aircraft in the competition, and we got the chance to fly in most of these planes, which included the CASA 101 and the Pilatus turboprop (if I recall correctly it was the PC-7). The T-46A, an entry from Fairchild-Republic, was available only as a full-scale mockup. I have to admit, it was cool just sitting in the T-46A mockup.

    Let's shift the story to the T-46A. In 1981, the NGT program was searching for a replacement for the T-37 primary jet trainer. The program had a long list of requirements, including the need to be able to enter a spin and then recover easily. Student pilots were required to enter a spin in the T-37 and then take appropriate actions to recover the airplane. There are very few military planes that allow spin training of any kind, so it was important that students see what a spin looked like and how to recover just in case they encountered a spin in their later aircraft. Fairchild-Republic, the same people who brought us the A-10, entered a design for a plane they called the T-46A. The design looked like something you would get if an A-10 and T-37 mated and had a baby. The T-46 shared many characteristics of the A-10: It had a twin tail and shared many components, including the stick, throttle, ejection seats, and many of the instruments. Like the other competitors, the T-46 had a light ground attack capability. The problem was that Fairchild didn't have a sample of the plane to test, while all the other competitors already had demonstrators. Fairchild built a demonstrator that was 62% in size, and used it as a proof-of-concept plane. After a year of trials, Fairchild won the NGT contract in 1982. They were to deliver several aircraft for testing, followed by 600+ trainers to replace the T-37. The first T-46 flew in 1985, which was about 6 months later than scheduled. Three planes were finally delivered for testing. Although few problems were encountered in the testing, another problem had come up that eventually doomed the program. In the year between the first demonstrator and the third, the cost-per-plane had risen from $1.5 million to $3 million. Also in 1985, Congress was trying to cut expenditures in the Federal Budget. Sadly, the T-46A and its escalating costs made it an easy target and the program was cancelled after just 3.6 airframes (the .6 is the 62% scale airframe). This also proved to be the end of Fairchild-Republic. The A-10 assembly line was already shut down, and they had no other planes being produced. With the loss of this contract, Fairchild permanently closed their Republic factory. In 2001, the Air Force replaced the T-37 (by this time the T-37 had been in service for over 40 years) with the T-6 Texan II (Pilatus PC-9).

    Now, on to the kit. As far as I know, this is the first plastic kit of the T-46. Anigrand released a 1/72 resin kit of the T-46 a while back, but I don't know of anyone who has built it. The kit comes from Sova-M, a Ukrainian company that is marketed by Modelsvit. This is one of the new era limited run kits coming out of the Ukraine, with some nice plastic parts, a photoetch fret, and canopy masks. There are decals for one plane. Everything in the box looks nice, so far, but I definitely plan to heed the sage advice to test fit, adjust as necessary, test fit again, and then glue. I have always thought the ejections seats make or break a model, so I decided to replace the kits seats with some nice resin seats designed for the A-10/F-15A, which should be the seat that would have been used in the actual plane. I am toying with the idea of figuring out a paint scheme that might have been used on this plane if it had entered service rather than the bland all-white paint scheme on the demonstrators. This will be a game-time decision.

    That's enough intro into this cool plane. I will be jumping into the build in the next few days. Cheers everyone.

    9 attached images. Click to enlarge.

  • Profile Photo
    Marc Spoor said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    We truly live in a Golden Age where almost anything we can imagine can be found in kit form! Thank you for posting your personal backstory and including the fascinating pictures! Will be following this thread with interest...

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    Indeed, a superb entry, my friend @gblair! I had no idea this plane existed, yet it looks so important now that I look at it.

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    Great entry, George @gblair
    Never heard about this aircraft nor Sova-M, but both, the aircraft as well as the kit look great.
    Looking forward to your build.

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    Marc (@mas): Thanks. I figure at some point we will all have 3D printers and will just buy the files to print our models.

    Spiros (@fiveten): Thanks. I never thought there would be a kit when there were only 3 prototypes and a 62% proof of concept plane. It is also amazing that they all survived in museums.

    John (@johnb): Thanks. Sova-M isn't well-known, but have made a number of kits, usually of some fairly obscure planes. I suspect they don't make many of each kit.

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    The cockpit on the model is simplified and is missing a number of things, including the side consoles on both sides. There is also a center console. The cockpit on this plane was laid out similar to a T-37, with two sets of throttles, one on the left cockpit wall, and the instructor's throttles on the center console. Both will need to be added. I dug out some of the pictures I took when they brought the full-scale mock up for evaluation.

    6 attached images. Click to enlarge.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    These are great reference pics, my friend @gblair!

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    Those pictures will be very helpful, George @gblair

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    Thanks, Spiros (@fiveten) and John (@johnb). There is also a good cockpit diagram in the pamphlet I have, so hopefully it won't be too difficult to add some stuff to the cockpit.

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    I started work on the cockpit today. The cockpit doesn't look too bad, except that it doesn't look anything like the real thing. The kit seats look nothing like the Aces II that were in the plane, the center console isn't the right shape, and there is a panel between each pair of rudder pedals that is totally missing. The biggest problem is the ejection seat are very short compared to the real thing, so I correctly suspected that the cockpit would be too shallow (it was). I ground away the locating strips for the floor on each side and then positioned the floor lower in the fuselage. There is a rudimentary box for the landing gear which needed to be lowered to allow the floor to be lower. Luckily the top of this box is quite thick and I was able to sand away enough plastic to allow the floor to sit flat. Getting some weight in the nose will be a whole different problem. I started fixing the issues, which will take some days to fix. Cheers everyone.

    7 attached images. Click to enlarge.

  • Profile Photo
    Colin Gomez said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    Very cool build, George. You are doing first class work fixing the cockpit. I had never heard of this aircraft. It's great how modeling - along with personal photos and a story to tell - can preserve history. It's odd to me that a turboprop like the PC-9 could replace a jet like the T-37 or be a better choice than another jet, the T-46A. The T-46A is a really attractive design with interesting features connecting it to the A-10. Too bad it never went into service. It looks like it could still compete as both a trainer and light attack aircraft.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    Great job so far, my friend @gblair! The new seats look great and your modifications/improvements are very effective.

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    Excellent start, George @gblair
    Those seats are a huge improvement over the original ones. Great work to get them fit this nicely.

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    I just finished what turned out to be a complete rebuild of the cockpit. I was hoping to get some help from the photoetch included with this kit, but it turns out none of the PE goes inside the cockpit. The only parts I used without change or replacement were the instrument panel and the shroud that goes around the instrument panel. I replaced the seats with resin ACES II seats, the side panels were cut down to shape, the rear bulkhead had some pipes and electronic boxes added, the missing center console was added, throttles were added for both the student and the instructor, rudder pedals were fabricated and added, and finally, two panels that fit under the instrument panel between the rudder pedals were added. I am not sure, but I think these last panels were for the rudder pedal adjustment that allows the pedals to be moved closer or farther from the seat for students of different heights. I also had to cut down the height of the control sticks, which extended almost to the top of the instrument panel as they came out of the box. Much too tall, the handle on the stick shouldn't be much taller than the seat. About a third of the length of the stick was removed. All I need to do now is remember to add as much weight as I can to the nose before I seal the fuselage. More tomorrow. Cheers.

    7 attached images. Click to enlarge.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 1 year, 8 months ago:

    Superb job there, my friend @gblair! The cockpit, a most prominent feature in these small trainers, really shines, will offer striking looks to the completed model!