Monogram P-40B. 50 Years Nostalgia Build.

Started by Seamus Boughe · 58 · 1 month ago
  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 2 months, 1 week ago:

    Fantastic job, my friend @seamus1! What a departure from the original wings!

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 2 months, 1 week ago:

    Excellent scratch building, Seamus @seamus1
    Those wheel wells and the ejection ports do look much better this way.

  • Profile Photo
    Tom Cleaver said 2 months, 1 week ago:

    Nice work here. Interestingly, all that raised riveting in the kit is actually right for a P-40. The only flush riveting on a real one (I've been around three P-40B restorations) is the leading edge of the wings back to the main spar - all the rest is raised, and for a kit first produced in 1965, they're amazingly close to scale and accurate. But sanding them off is certainly no dealbreaker.

  • Profile Photo
    Seamus Boughe said 2 months, 1 week ago:

    I guess it's a matter of choosing the lesser of two evils. I don't have a problem with rivets but I am not a fan of raised panel lines and that is why I scribe. Thing is, when sanding down the panel lines it is inevitable that you are going to lose a lot of rivet detail in the process. Now I am somewhat anal when it comes to detailing, however, I am not that anal that I am going to attempt to replace all the riveting that I sanded off (heck, I wouldn't know how even if I wanted to). Just going to leave her clean. I don't think she will look too bad.

  • Profile Photo
    Stephen W Towle said 2 months, 1 week ago:

    Seamus (@seamus1),

    What I like about this build of yours is that your doing everything old school.Its a hands on model and you can proudly say I made this. Today's models with the resin, PE, 3D decals, computer printed parts are drop in stuff which removes the modeler from the craft or being a artisan. What your doing is more original. Which is not to take away from the needs of other modelers. What is neat about this kit are the screw heads and the rivets which is a matter of perception. If your 3 ft or 5 ft it won't matter and if you want to scribe the lines by hand it makes your work more original. Some strong modeling is being done here.

    .

  • Profile Photo
    Seamus Boughe said 2 months, 1 week ago:

    Having entered the hobby in the late 1960s and continuing on through the mid 1970s before taking a respite, yeah, I am an old school modeler. I agree with your statement about the removal of the modeler from the craft when it comes to the more modern kits. However, the main reason I do what I do is because I'm f**king cheap or, better yet, frugal. In my youth, scale modeling was an affordable hobby. When I returned to the hobby in the early 1990s, I was kind of shocked to see kits going for 20/25 dollars. But I figured in the cost of living as well as kits being a lot better than the ones I built in my youth. Nowadays, however, I feel the pricing of kits to be way out of hand. Most of my stash are kits I bought used from modeling shows, thrift shops, or online sellers. I prefer older kits not only because they're cheap, but also because they allow my to use and sharpen the skills I picked up during the 1970s and beyond.

  • Profile Photo
    Tom Cleaver said 2 months, 1 week ago:

    Definitely won't.

  • Profile Photo
    Stephen W Towle said 2 months, 1 week ago:

    Seamus,
    I've seen your Hurricane and Spitfire builds and for being "Cheap" they turned out to be respectable and have details that some high ends kits don't have. Being a self taught artisan with skills rocks.

  • Profile Photo
    Seamus Boughe said 1 month, 3 weeks ago:

    The thing that intrigued me most when I first built this kit some 50 years ago was the option of positional landing flaps. Here it is, 50 years later, and I still am intrigued by this option. I decided to put the landing flaps in the down position but, this time, I am going to add the interior structure to the inside of the upper wing halves. No, it will not be 100% accurate or correct. As I plan to put my P-40 on a base once it is complete, not much of the inner flap structure will be seen anyway. I just want to give the impression of something being there hence creative gizmology.

    6 attached images. Click to enlarge.

  • Profile Photo
    Spiros Pendedekas said 1 month, 3 weeks ago:

    Excellent internal detail, my friend @seamus1!

  • Profile Photo
    John vd Biggelaar said 1 month, 3 weeks ago:

    Those details look great, Seamus @seamus1

  • Profile Photo
    George R Blair Jr said 1 month, 3 weeks ago:

    Coming along nicely, Seamus @seamus1. Looking forward to the rest of your detailing adventures. I found the first release of this kit last week in the consignments at my local hobby shop for just a few dollars. I think I may build it in the future basically straight from the box so that I can get that original 1960s feel.

  • Profile Photo
    Jay Mitchell said 1 month, 3 weeks ago:

    Some very impressive scratch building going on with this P-40. Looks very nice.